<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Vlad Hrybok's Tech Notes - Windows 7</title>
    <link>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/</link>
    <description>The future of Internet is &lt;a href='http://httpvpn.com'&gt;HttpVPN&lt;/a&gt;...</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Vlad Hrybok</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:32:20 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 1.9.6264.0</generator>
    <managingEditor>vgribok@dodgeit.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>vgribok@dodgeit.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=18aea458-8fdc-4cbc-8b9a-90268aa28dbf</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,18aea458-8fdc-4cbc-8b9a-90268aa28dbf.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Vlad Hrybok</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/CommentView,guid,18aea458-8fdc-4cbc-8b9a-90268aa28dbf.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=18aea458-8fdc-4cbc-8b9a-90268aa28dbf</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
          <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/954958">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/954958</a>
        </p>
        <p>
BTW, Windows 7 and Server 2008 R2 have Hyper-V HAL drivers in them, so when those
two are installed as guest OSes, they take advantage of hardware virtualization even
during installation, which makes the installation process go much faster compared
to other guest OSes, and at the end of the installation one does not need to
install Hyper-V integration services.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/aggbug.ashx?id=18aea458-8fdc-4cbc-8b9a-90268aa28dbf" />
      </body>
      <title>Guest Operating Systems Supported by Microsoft Hyper-V</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,18aea458-8fdc-4cbc-8b9a-90268aa28dbf.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,18aea458-8fdc-4cbc-8b9a-90268aa28dbf.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:32:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/954958"&gt;http://support.microsoft.com/kb/954958&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
BTW, Windows 7 and Server 2008 R2 have Hyper-V HAL drivers in them, so when those
two are installed as guest OSes, they take advantage of hardware virtualization even
during installation, which makes the installation process go much faster compared
to other guest OSes, and at the end of&amp;nbsp;the installation one does not need to
install Hyper-V integration services.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/aggbug.ashx?id=18aea458-8fdc-4cbc-8b9a-90268aa28dbf" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/CommentView,guid,18aea458-8fdc-4cbc-8b9a-90268aa28dbf.aspx</comments>
      <category>Software Testing;Virtual Server;Windows 7</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=b337fd48-7f00-4633-a31a-2a22352fbf90</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,b337fd48-7f00-4633-a31a-2a22352fbf90.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Vlad Hrybok</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/CommentView,guid,b337fd48-7f00-4633-a31a-2a22352fbf90.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=b337fd48-7f00-4633-a31a-2a22352fbf90</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Update: here's a very good <a href="http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=52912">walk-through</a> of
setting up BIOS on Intel chipset motherboard for OCZ SSD RAID array. 
</p>
        <p>
Since I was about to clean up my system anyway, I decided not only to install Windows
7, but also bite the bullet and get two SSD drives and put them into striped RAID
configuration. I did it last weekend and yes, rumors are true: the performance boost
you get from SSDs, especially from RAID-0 SSDs is by far the most noticeable and exciting
in a generation. (From this point on, spindle hard drives are entering their twilight
years, and pretty soon they will be where CRT displays are now.) It's kind
of perverse, but perf improvement is so drastic that it now takes less time for Windows
to boot than for the motherboard to finish the POST!
</p>
        <p>
Here are points that might be useful for those trying to do similar setup.
</p>
        <p>
- Not every SSD drive can be used in RAID configuration. At this point you need to
stick with SSD drives having <strong>Indilinx controller</strong>. 60GB MLC drives
like <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227394">OCZ
Vertex</a>, <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820233090">Corsair
Extreme</a>, and <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227461">OCZ
Agility</a> (the one I got, <a href="http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/Reviews/Print.aspx?ArticleId=25727">see
the review</a>) - are all reasonably priced and will work well with mainstream motherboards-based
RAID controllers, like Intel Matrix RAID. Two of these drives cost just a little over
what <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227395">single
128GB drive costs</a>, but two 64GB drives give you two controllers, twice the amount
of on the drive cache, and connection to two separate SATA channels, all of which delivers much
better performance than a single 128GB drive for about the same amount of money.
</p>
        <p>
- Windows 7 does have Intel Matrix RAID driver, so <strong>no need to do the F6</strong> thing
to load it during windows installation.
</p>
        <p>
- If you are putting your drives into a desktop machine, you will need <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817994072">mounting
brackets</a> to fit 2.5" drives into 3.5" bays.
</p>
        <p>
- Since both Windows 7 and SSD drives are relatively new products, <strong>load the
latest BIOS</strong> for your motherboard before you even connect your drives for
the first time. It's also a good idea to get a relatively recent motherboard
and ensure your mobo does indeed have RAID functionality. For example, if your motherboard
has Intel chipset, letter "R" in ICH10<strong>R</strong> "south bridge" chip name seems
to indicate presence of RAID support.
</p>
        <p>
- If your motherboard has Intel Matrix RAID, <strong>change BIOS</strong> settings
to make sure you put your on-board SATA controller into RAID mode. It actually
should be called AHCI+RAID, because RAID is still AHCI. Non-RAID SATA drives may
still be used when SATA controller in RAID mode with no problem at all.
</p>
        <p>
- Even though Windows 7 comes ready for SSD drives, tweaks like <a href="http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=7558&amp;amp;stc=1&amp;amp;d=1228254339">disabling SSD
drive indexing</a> will improve either drives' longevity or system performance.
Also, Windows 7 may not see the RAID group as 100% SSD. What it means is that when
Win7 realizes there is an SSD drive in the system, it's supposed to automatically
turn off superfetch and disk defragmentation. In my case it did turn off disk defrag
for my SSD RAID volume, <a href="http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=7557&amp;stc=1&amp;d=1228252264">but
didn't turn off superfetch</a> - maybe because I have a couple of regular hard drives
also connected (although not members of the RAID array).
</p>
        <p>
- If you wonder whether ATA Trim command (that helps to maintain SSD drives' performance)
is going to work in RAID configuration, then the answer is not yet. Currently, the
choices for SSDs connected to Intel matrix raid controller are either
RAID, or TRIM, but not both together. The reason for that is Intel Matrix Storage
Manager (MSM) driver does not pass through TRIM command - only MS SATA and IDE drivers
for Windows 7 do. So for TRIM one needs to use Microsoft drivers, which do not
support MSM RAID. So if you do RAID, you will need to use Intel MSM driver, and wait
for some future version of MSM that can support TRIM in at least in RAID-0 and
RAID-1 configurations.
</p>
        <p>
- Next version of OCZ firmware for Agility and Vertex SSD drives is expected to have
background "garbage collection" built in, which is supposed to reset NAND cells while
drives are idling.
</p>
        <p>
Here's a <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/e7/archive/2009/05/05/support-and-q-a-for-solid-state-drives-and.aspx">very
good post about SSDs on Windows 7</a>, plus an<strong> </strong><a href="http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=3607"><strong>absolute
must-read article</strong></a> about most popular SSD drives from AnandTech.com.
</p>
        <p>
ATTO benchmarks:<br />
Take a look a all-important 4KB transfer rates (most common case for non-server
scenarios) - it does astonishing 178MB/s writes and 180MB/s reads:<br /><img border="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/content/binary/2x%20OCZ%20Agility%2060GB%20SSD%20drives%20in%20RAID-0%20on%20Windows%207%20-%20ATTO%20benchmark%20results.png" /></p>
        <p>
Compare it with <a href="http://hothardware.com/image_popup.aspx?image=big_vertex-turbo-atto.jpg&amp;articleid=10402&amp;t=n">53MB/s
writes and 35MB/s reads</a> of $440-worth, fastest 120GB MLC drive - <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227470">OCZ
Vertex Turbo</a>:<br /><a href="http://hothardware.com/image_popup.aspx?image=big_vertex-turbo-atto.jpg&amp;articleid=10402&amp;t=n"><img src="http://hothardware.com/newsimages/item10402/big_vertex-turbo-atto.jpg" /></a><br /><br />
...or with arguably the best SSD drive there is - <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820167014">$800</a> Intel
X-25E SLC drive - it does <a href="http://www.clunk.org.uk/reviews/kingston-technology-ssdnow-e-series-intel-x25-e-solid-state-drive-review/Page-6.html">104MB/s
writes and 120MB/s reads</a> on 4KB block size:<br /><a href="http://www.clunk.org.uk/reviews/kingston-technology-ssdnow-e-series-intel-x25-e-solid-state-drive-review/Page-6.html"><img src="http://www.images.clunk.org.uk/reviews/Kingston/results/atto/atto-ahci/atto-ahci-matrix.png" /></a></p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/aggbug.ashx?id=b337fd48-7f00-4633-a31a-2a22352fbf90" />
      </body>
      <title>Budget SSD RAID-0 on Windows 7</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,b337fd48-7f00-4633-a31a-2a22352fbf90.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,b337fd48-7f00-4633-a31a-2a22352fbf90.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:52:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Update: here's a very good &lt;a href="http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=52912"&gt;walk-through&lt;/a&gt; of
setting up BIOS on Intel chipset motherboard for OCZ SSD RAID array. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Since I was about to clean up my system anyway, I decided not only to install Windows
7, but also bite the bullet and get two SSD drives and put them into striped RAID
configuration. I did it last weekend and yes, rumors are true: the performance boost
you get from SSDs, especially from RAID-0 SSDs is by far the most noticeable and exciting
in a generation. (From this point on, spindle hard drives are entering their twilight
years, and&amp;nbsp;pretty soon they&amp;nbsp;will be where CRT displays are now.) It's kind
of perverse, but perf improvement is so drastic that it now takes less time for Windows
to boot than for the motherboard to finish the POST!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Here are points that might be useful for those trying to do&amp;nbsp;similar setup.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
- Not every SSD drive can be used in RAID configuration. At this point you need to
stick with SSD drives having &lt;strong&gt;Indilinx controller&lt;/strong&gt;. 60GB MLC drives
like &lt;a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227394"&gt;OCZ
Vertex&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820233090"&gt;Corsair
Extreme&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227461"&gt;OCZ
Agility&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(the one I got, &lt;a href="http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/Reviews/Print.aspx?ArticleId=25727"&gt;see
the review&lt;/a&gt;) - are all reasonably priced and will work well with mainstream motherboards-based
RAID controllers, like Intel Matrix RAID. Two of these drives cost just a little over
what &lt;a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227395"&gt;single
128GB drive costs&lt;/a&gt;, but two 64GB drives give you two controllers, twice the amount
of on the drive cache, and&amp;nbsp;connection to two separate SATA channels, all of which&amp;nbsp;delivers&amp;nbsp;much
better performance than a single 128GB drive for about the same amount of money.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
- Windows 7 does have Intel Matrix RAID driver, so &lt;strong&gt;no need to do the F6&lt;/strong&gt; thing
to load it during windows installation.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
- If you are putting your drives into a desktop machine, you will need &lt;a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817994072"&gt;mounting
brackets&lt;/a&gt; to fit 2.5" drives into 3.5" bays.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
- Since both Windows 7 and SSD drives are relatively new products, &lt;strong&gt;load the
latest BIOS&lt;/strong&gt; for your motherboard before you even connect your drives for
the first time. It's also a good idea to&amp;nbsp;get a&amp;nbsp;relatively recent motherboard
and ensure your mobo does indeed have RAID functionality. For example, if your motherboard
has Intel chipset, letter "R" in ICH10&lt;strong&gt;R&lt;/strong&gt; "south bridge" chip name&amp;nbsp;seems
to indicate presence of RAID support.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
- If your motherboard has Intel Matrix RAID, &lt;strong&gt;change BIOS&lt;/strong&gt; settings
to make sure you put your on-board&amp;nbsp;SATA controller into RAID mode. It actually
should be called AHCI+RAID, because&amp;nbsp;RAID is still AHCI. Non-RAID SATA drives&amp;nbsp;may
still be used when SATA controller in RAID mode with no problem at all.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
- Even though Windows 7 comes ready for SSD drives, tweaks like &lt;a href="http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=7558&amp;amp;amp;stc=1&amp;amp;amp;d=1228254339"&gt;disabling&amp;nbsp;SSD
drive&amp;nbsp;indexing&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;will improve either drives' longevity or system performance.
Also, Windows 7 may not see the RAID group as 100% SSD. What it means is that when
Win7 realizes there is an SSD drive in the system, it's supposed to automatically
turn off superfetch and disk defragmentation. In my case it did turn off disk defrag
for my SSD RAID volume, &lt;a href="http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=7557&amp;amp;stc=1&amp;amp;d=1228252264"&gt;but
didn't turn off superfetch&lt;/a&gt; - maybe because I have a couple of regular hard drives
also connected (although not members of the RAID array).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
- If you wonder whether ATA Trim command (that helps to maintain SSD drives' performance)
is going to work in RAID configuration, then the answer is not yet. Currently, the
choices for SSDs&amp;nbsp;connected to Intel&amp;nbsp;matrix raid controller&amp;nbsp;are either
RAID, or TRIM, but not both together. The reason for that is Intel Matrix Storage
Manager (MSM) driver does not pass through TRIM command - only MS SATA and IDE drivers
for Windows 7 do. So for TRIM one needs to use&amp;nbsp;Microsoft drivers, which do not
support MSM RAID. So if you do RAID, you will need to use Intel MSM driver, and wait
for some future version of MSM that can support TRIM&amp;nbsp;in at least in RAID-0 and
RAID-1 configurations.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
- Next version of OCZ firmware for Agility and Vertex SSD drives is expected to have
background "garbage collection" built in, which is supposed to reset NAND cells while
drives are idling.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Here's a &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/e7/archive/2009/05/05/support-and-q-a-for-solid-state-drives-and.aspx"&gt;very
good&amp;nbsp;post about SSDs on Windows 7&lt;/a&gt;, plus an&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=3607"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;absolute
must-read&amp;nbsp;article&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; about most popular SSD drives from AnandTech.com.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
ATTO benchmarks:&lt;br&gt;
Take a look a all-important 4KB transfer rates (most common case for&amp;nbsp;non-server
scenarios) - it does&amp;nbsp;astonishing 178MB/s writes and 180MB/s reads:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img border=0 src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/content/binary/2x%20OCZ%20Agility%2060GB%20SSD%20drives%20in%20RAID-0%20on%20Windows%207%20-%20ATTO%20benchmark%20results.png"&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Compare it with &lt;a href="http://hothardware.com/image_popup.aspx?image=big_vertex-turbo-atto.jpg&amp;amp;articleid=10402&amp;amp;t=n"&gt;53MB/s
writes and 35MB/s reads&lt;/a&gt; of&amp;nbsp;$440-worth, fastest 120GB MLC drive - &lt;a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227470"&gt;OCZ
Vertex Turbo&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://hothardware.com/image_popup.aspx?image=big_vertex-turbo-atto.jpg&amp;amp;articleid=10402&amp;amp;t=n"&gt;&lt;img src="http://hothardware.com/newsimages/item10402/big_vertex-turbo-atto.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
...or with arguably the best SSD drive there is -&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820167014"&gt;$800&lt;/a&gt; Intel
X-25E SLC drive - it does &lt;a href="http://www.clunk.org.uk/reviews/kingston-technology-ssdnow-e-series-intel-x25-e-solid-state-drive-review/Page-6.html"&gt;104MB/s
writes and 120MB/s reads&lt;/a&gt; on 4KB block size:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.clunk.org.uk/reviews/kingston-technology-ssdnow-e-series-intel-x25-e-solid-state-drive-review/Page-6.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.images.clunk.org.uk/reviews/Kingston/results/atto/atto-ahci/atto-ahci-matrix.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/aggbug.ashx?id=b337fd48-7f00-4633-a31a-2a22352fbf90" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/CommentView,guid,b337fd48-7f00-4633-a31a-2a22352fbf90.aspx</comments>
      <category>Hardware;Performance;Windows 7;x64</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=10c17b62-dc64-45d1-a175-50482baaa9b2</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,10c17b62-dc64-45d1-a175-50482baaa9b2.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Vlad Hrybok</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/CommentView,guid,10c17b62-dc64-45d1-a175-50482baaa9b2.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=10c17b62-dc64-45d1-a175-50482baaa9b2</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Whenever I setup a new Windows PC, I always forget which virutal CD/DVD software I
use. So this is a note to myself: it's <a href="http://www.magiciso.com/tutorials/miso-magicdisc-overview.htm">MagicISO</a>.
It allows to mount an ISO image right after the software is installed, without requiring
a reboot, and it works with both x64 and 32-bit version of Windows, including Vista
and Win 7. Great tool!
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/aggbug.ashx?id=10c17b62-dc64-45d1-a175-50482baaa9b2" />
      </body>
      <title>MagicISO (MagicDIsk) is a Superb Free Virtual CD/DVD Drive Emulator</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,10c17b62-dc64-45d1-a175-50482baaa9b2.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,10c17b62-dc64-45d1-a175-50482baaa9b2.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:42:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Whenever I setup a new Windows PC, I always forget which virutal CD/DVD software I
use. So this is a note to myself: it's &lt;a href="http://www.magiciso.com/tutorials/miso-magicdisc-overview.htm"&gt;MagicISO&lt;/a&gt;.
It allows to mount an ISO image right after the software is installed, without requiring
a reboot, and it works with both x64 and 32-bit version of Windows, including Vista
and Win 7. Great tool!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/aggbug.ashx?id=10c17b62-dc64-45d1-a175-50482baaa9b2" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/CommentView,guid,10c17b62-dc64-45d1-a175-50482baaa9b2.aspx</comments>
      <category>Sofware Development;Vista;Windows 7</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>