<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Vlad Hrybok's Tech Notes - VmWare</title>
    <link>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/</link>
    <description>The future of Internet is &lt;a href='http://httpvpn.com'&gt;HttpVPN&lt;/a&gt;...</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Vlad Hrybok</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:31:40 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 1.9.6264.0</generator>
    <managingEditor>vgribok@dodgeit.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>vgribok@dodgeit.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=197b3761-a02f-4a03-9eaa-cb4db48acf2b</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,197b3761-a02f-4a03-9eaa-cb4db48acf2b.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Vlad Hrybok</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/CommentView,guid,197b3761-a02f-4a03-9eaa-cb4db48acf2b.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=197b3761-a02f-4a03-9eaa-cb4db48acf2b</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
While comparing two Intel quad-core CPUs, <a href="http://compare.intel.com/pcc/showchart.aspx?mmID=35380,885492&amp;familyID=1&amp;culture=en-US">Q6600
and Q8200</a>, it was hard to arrive at the decision because for some inexplicable
reason Intel does not state the TDP of Q6600. I reviewed several sources, and
values are all over the map, from clearly incorrect 65W, to what looks like actual
value of <strong>105 Watt</strong>. 
</p>
        <p>
Since both CPUs <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&amp;N=2010340343%201051707842%201302825342&amp;name=Quad-Core">cost
$190</a> at this point, the decision which one to get comes down to whether you'd
rather have a VT (virtualization technology), twice (8MB) the L2 cache and a
little higher 2.4GHz clock of Q6600, vs. faster 1333 MHz FSB and 10W less
of power consumption of Q8200.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/aggbug.ashx?id=197b3761-a02f-4a03-9eaa-cb4db48acf2b" />
      </body>
      <title>Intel Q6600 Thermal Power Dissipation (TDP)</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,197b3761-a02f-4a03-9eaa-cb4db48acf2b.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,197b3761-a02f-4a03-9eaa-cb4db48acf2b.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:31:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
While comparing two Intel quad-core CPUs, &lt;a href="http://compare.intel.com/pcc/showchart.aspx?mmID=35380,885492&amp;amp;familyID=1&amp;amp;culture=en-US"&gt;Q6600
and Q8200&lt;/a&gt;, it was hard to arrive at the decision because for some inexplicable
reason Intel does not state the TDP of Q6600. I reviewed&amp;nbsp;several sources, and
values are all over the map, from clearly incorrect 65W, to what looks like actual
value of &lt;strong&gt;105 Watt&lt;/strong&gt;. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Since both CPUs &lt;a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&amp;amp;N=2010340343%201051707842%201302825342&amp;amp;name=Quad-Core"&gt;cost
$190&lt;/a&gt; at this point,&amp;nbsp;the decision which one to get comes down to whether you'd
rather have a VT (virtualization technology), twice (8MB)&amp;nbsp;the L2 cache and a
little&amp;nbsp;higher 2.4GHz&amp;nbsp;clock of Q6600, vs. faster 1333 MHz FSB and 10W less
of power consumption of Q8200.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/aggbug.ashx?id=197b3761-a02f-4a03-9eaa-cb4db48acf2b" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/CommentView,guid,197b3761-a02f-4a03-9eaa-cb4db48acf2b.aspx</comments>
      <category>Hardware;Performance;Virtual Server;VmWare</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=524ceb1d-3723-4643-9540-17d1b52b9a97</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,524ceb1d-3723-4643-9540-17d1b52b9a97.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Vlad Hrybok</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/CommentView,guid,524ceb1d-3723-4643-9540-17d1b52b9a97.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=524ceb1d-3723-4643-9540-17d1b52b9a97</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
If it takes too long to redraw the screen when you access your remote virtual machine
using VmWare Server Console or Microsoft Virtual Server admin page, consider terminaling
into your virtual machines using Remote Desktop or Terminal Server client. UI works
as fast as with any "real" remote PC. Entry-level Windows XP Home and Vista Home don't
support Remote Desktop, but all Pro, Business, Media Center Edition and other flavors
of Windows Vista, XP and 2003 work just fine. One of my co-workers told me Remote
Desktop can be used for VmWare Workstation access, but I also tested <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/server/">VmWare
Server</a> and <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/virtualserver/downloads/default.mspx">Microsoft
Virtual Server R2</a>, and those two also do it.
</p>
        <p>
To enable Remote Desktop access a few things usually need to be done:
</p>
        <p>
1. Enable RD access:<br /><img src="content/binary/EnablingRemoteDesktopAccessXP.png" border="0" /></p>
        <p>
2. Ensure your user account is a member of the Administrators group.<br />
3. The password on your user account is not blank.<br /><br />
The only issue I had with this setup was sometimes I couldn't ping the virtual machine
due to networking issue. But when that happens all attempts to access that
virtual machine over the LAN fail, including NetBIOS file shares, web access - anything.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/aggbug.ashx?id=524ceb1d-3723-4643-9540-17d1b52b9a97" />
      </body>
      <title>Use Remote Desktop to access Windows virtual machines running under VmWare Server or MS Virtual Server</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,524ceb1d-3723-4643-9540-17d1b52b9a97.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,524ceb1d-3723-4643-9540-17d1b52b9a97.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 17:19:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
If it takes too long to redraw the screen when you access your remote virtual machine
using VmWare Server Console or Microsoft Virtual Server admin page, consider terminaling
into your virtual machines using Remote Desktop or Terminal Server client. UI works
as fast as with any "real" remote PC. Entry-level Windows XP Home and Vista Home don't
support Remote Desktop, but all Pro, Business, Media Center Edition and other flavors
of Windows Vista, XP and 2003 work just fine. One of my co-workers told me Remote
Desktop can be used for VmWare Workstation access, but I also tested &lt;a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/server/"&gt;VmWare
Server&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/virtualserver/downloads/default.mspx"&gt;Microsoft
Virtual Server R2&lt;/a&gt;, and those two also do it.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
To enable Remote Desktop access a few things usually need to be done:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
1. Enable RD access:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="content/binary/EnablingRemoteDesktopAccessXP.png" border=0&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
2. Ensure your user account is a member of the Administrators group.&lt;br&gt;
3. The password on your user account is not blank.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The only issue I had with this setup was sometimes I couldn't ping the virtual machine
due to networking issue. But when that happens&amp;nbsp;all attempts to access&amp;nbsp;that
virtual machine over the LAN fail, including NetBIOS file shares, web access - anything.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/aggbug.ashx?id=524ceb1d-3723-4643-9540-17d1b52b9a97" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/CommentView,guid,524ceb1d-3723-4643-9540-17d1b52b9a97.aspx</comments>
      <category>Software Testing;Virtual Server;VmWare</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=d5c6c382-842b-44ea-9e2a-9f6192b37134</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,d5c6c382-842b-44ea-9e2a-9f6192b37134.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Vlad Hrybok</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/CommentView,guid,d5c6c382-842b-44ea-9e2a-9f6192b37134.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=d5c6c382-842b-44ea-9e2a-9f6192b37134</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
I need to test my software on a variety of 64-bit Windows versions. I hoped I would
be able to use <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/virtualserver/downloads/default.mspx">Microsoft
Virtual Server</a>, which I've been successfully using for a while for 32-bit tests
(including German, Russian and Korean flavors of Windows - quite a feat for a Ukrainian
with English as a second language), but to no avail - at this point even latest MS
Virtual Server is unable to host 64-bit guest operating systems. So despite enjoying
being lazy, I was forced to check out free <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/server/">VmWare
Server</a>. I hoped to run it on my main Vista x64 dev box, but VmWare Server did
not install correctly on Vista x64. That was quite a setback for my product delivery
schedule, because I realized I needed another box with 64-bit Windows 2003 Server on
it to be sure I could run VmWare Server. I dug through my closet with PC parts and
after combining what I had with $200 worth of parts bought from <a href="http://NewEgg.com">NewEgg.com</a> I
had a modest 64-bit box with Pentium D 805 and 1GB of DDR memory. VmWare has installed
without a problem, but when I attempted to install Windows XP x64 VmWare Server told
me that my Pentium D CPU is no good because when it comes to Intel CPUs, 64 bit guest
OSes can run only on EMT64 units with Virtualization Technology (VT) support! Fortunately,
my dev desktop had Core 2 Duo E6300, which does have VT support, and both Pentium
D and Core 2 Duo use the same LGA 775 package, so I was able to simply swap CPUs and
ta-da! - after that VmWare finally started cooperating and is installing XP x64 guest
OS as I'm typing this article.
</p>
        <p>
Conclusion: If you want to run 64-bit guest OS in VmWare using Intel CPU you will
need a box with a processor supporting <strong>Virtualization Technology</strong>,
and run <strong>Windows 2003 x64</strong> as a host OS.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/aggbug.ashx?id=d5c6c382-842b-44ea-9e2a-9f6192b37134" />
      </body>
      <title>Your Intel EMT64 CPU has to have VT support to run 64-bit guest Windows OSes on VmWare Server</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,d5c6c382-842b-44ea-9e2a-9f6192b37134.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,d5c6c382-842b-44ea-9e2a-9f6192b37134.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 03:08:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
I need to test my software on a variety of 64-bit Windows versions. I hoped I would
be able to use &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/virtualserver/downloads/default.mspx"&gt;Microsoft
Virtual Server&lt;/a&gt;, which I've been successfully using for a while for 32-bit tests
(including German, Russian and Korean flavors of Windows - quite a feat for a Ukrainian
with English as a second language), but to no avail - at this point even latest MS
Virtual Server is unable to host 64-bit guest operating systems. So despite enjoying
being lazy, I was forced to check out free &lt;a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/server/"&gt;VmWare
Server&lt;/a&gt;. I hoped to run it on my main Vista x64 dev box, but VmWare Server did
not install correctly on Vista x64. That was quite a setback for my product delivery
schedule, because I realized I needed another&amp;nbsp;box with 64-bit Windows 2003 Server&amp;nbsp;on
it to be sure I could run VmWare Server. I dug through my closet with PC parts and
after combining what I had with $200 worth of parts bought from &lt;a href="http://NewEgg.com"&gt;NewEgg.com&lt;/a&gt; I
had a modest 64-bit box with Pentium D 805 and 1GB of DDR memory. VmWare has installed
without a problem, but when I attempted to install Windows XP x64 VmWare Server told
me that my Pentium D CPU is no good because when it comes to Intel CPUs, 64 bit guest
OSes can run only on EMT64 units with Virtualization Technology (VT) support! Fortunately,
my dev desktop had Core 2 Duo E6300, which does have VT support, and both Pentium
D and Core 2 Duo use the same LGA 775 package, so I was able to simply swap CPUs and
ta-da! - after that VmWare finally started cooperating and is installing XP x64 guest
OS as I'm typing this article.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Conclusion: If you want to run 64-bit guest OS in VmWare using Intel CPU you will
need a box with a processor supporting &lt;strong&gt;Virtualization Technology&lt;/strong&gt;,
and run&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Windows 2003 x64&lt;/strong&gt; as a host OS.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/aggbug.ashx?id=d5c6c382-842b-44ea-9e2a-9f6192b37134" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/CommentView,guid,d5c6c382-842b-44ea-9e2a-9f6192b37134.aspx</comments>
      <category>Software Testing;Virtual Server;Vista;VmWare;x64</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=d91bf2d7-53b7-4909-990b-fb9a7bc2ef20</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,d91bf2d7-53b7-4909-990b-fb9a7bc2ef20.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Vlad Hrybok</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/CommentView,guid,d91bf2d7-53b7-4909-990b-fb9a7bc2ef20.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=d91bf2d7-53b7-4909-990b-fb9a7bc2ef20</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
After installing VmWare Server on 64-bit Windows 2003 Server R2, I was unable to access
VmWare Server's web admin page due to <strong>Service Unavailable</strong> error.
VmWare support forum suggests to <a href="http://www.vmware.com/community/message.jspa?messageID=505302">remove
.NET Framework 2.0</a>, which seems to help some people, but I fixed the problem by <strong><em>repairing</em></strong> .NET
Framework 2.0 installation after VmWare server was installed. To do that go to Control
Panel -&gt; Add/Remove Programs, select .NET Framework and hit Change/Remove button.
In the dialog select repair and let it run. After that both Default Web site and VmWare
web site were running fine.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/aggbug.ashx?id=d91bf2d7-53b7-4909-990b-fb9a7bc2ef20" />
      </body>
      <title>"Service Unavailable" error when accessing VmWare Server web admin running on Windows 2003 Server R2 x64</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,d91bf2d7-53b7-4909-990b-fb9a7bc2ef20.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,d91bf2d7-53b7-4909-990b-fb9a7bc2ef20.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 05:25:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
After installing VmWare Server on 64-bit Windows 2003 Server R2, I was unable to access
VmWare Server's web admin page due to &lt;strong&gt;Service Unavailable&lt;/strong&gt; error.
VmWare support forum suggests to &lt;a href="http://www.vmware.com/community/message.jspa?messageID=505302"&gt;remove
.NET Framework 2.0&lt;/a&gt;, which seems to help some people, but I fixed the problem by &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;repairing&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; .NET
Framework 2.0 installation after VmWare server was installed. To do that go to Control
Panel -&amp;gt; Add/Remove Programs, select .NET Framework and hit Change/Remove button.
In the dialog select repair and let it run. After that both Default Web site and VmWare
web site were running fine.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/aggbug.ashx?id=d91bf2d7-53b7-4909-990b-fb9a7bc2ef20" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/CommentView,guid,d91bf2d7-53b7-4909-990b-fb9a7bc2ef20.aspx</comments>
      <category>Software Testing;VmWare;x64</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=40fbefde-2b91-4b47-bc6a-d4f48e53af61</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,40fbefde-2b91-4b47-bc6a-d4f48e53af61.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Vlad Hrybok</dc:creator>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=40fbefde-2b91-4b47-bc6a-d4f48e53af61</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Microsoft <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/virtualserver/downloads/servicepack.mspx">Virtual
Server R2 SP Beta</a> works really well on Vista x64 and Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 CPU,
which has Virtualization support. Installer was not completely hands-off - I had to
add CGI module to IIS7 manually - otherwise VSWebApp.exe was treated as downloadable
file and not as CGI module. MS needs to update VS installer to automate this step.
</p>
        <p>
Please note that although MS Virtual Server R2 Beta can run on Vista x64, it can't
host 64-bit OSes. To host 64 bit OSes you would need free <a href="PermaLink,guid,d5c6c382-842b-44ea-9e2a-9f6192b37134.aspx">VmWare
Server</a> installed on x64 Windows 2003 Server, and either AMD 64 bit CPU or Intel
EMT64 CPU with Virtualization Technology (VT) support (like Core 2 Duo E6300
or E6400 CPUs).
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/aggbug.ashx?id=40fbefde-2b91-4b47-bc6a-d4f48e53af61" />
      </body>
      <title>Microsoft Virtual Server R2 SP1 on Vista x64 and Intel Core 2 Duo CPU</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,40fbefde-2b91-4b47-bc6a-d4f48e53af61.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,40fbefde-2b91-4b47-bc6a-d4f48e53af61.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:29:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Microsoft &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/virtualserver/downloads/servicepack.mspx"&gt;Virtual
Server R2 SP Beta&lt;/a&gt; works really well on Vista x64 and Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 CPU,
which has Virtualization support. Installer was not completely hands-off - I had to
add CGI module to IIS7 manually - otherwise VSWebApp.exe was treated as downloadable
file and not as CGI module. MS needs to update VS installer to automate this step.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Please note that although MS Virtual Server R2 Beta can run on Vista x64, it can't
host 64-bit OSes. To host 64 bit OSes you would need free &lt;a href="PermaLink,guid,d5c6c382-842b-44ea-9e2a-9f6192b37134.aspx"&gt;VmWare
Server&lt;/a&gt; installed on x64 Windows 2003 Server, and either AMD 64 bit CPU or Intel
EMT64 CPU with Virtualization Technology (VT)&amp;nbsp;support (like Core 2 Duo E6300
or E6400 CPUs).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/aggbug.ashx?id=40fbefde-2b91-4b47-bc6a-d4f48e53af61" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/CommentView,guid,40fbefde-2b91-4b47-bc6a-d4f48e53af61.aspx</comments>
      <category>IIS7;Software Testing;Virtual Server;Vista;VmWare;x64</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>