<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Vlad Hrybok's Tech Notes - IIS7</title>
    <link>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/</link>
    <description>The future of Internet is &lt;a href='http://httpvpn.com'&gt;HttpVPN&lt;/a&gt;...</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Vlad Hrybok</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 20:20:28 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 1.9.6264.0</generator>
    <managingEditor>vgribok@dodgeit.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>vgribok@dodgeit.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=68d9cc66-8f77-49b0-9e35-16f729116120</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,68d9cc66-8f77-49b0-9e35-16f729116120.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Vlad Hrybok</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/CommentView,guid,68d9cc66-8f77-49b0-9e35-16f729116120.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=68d9cc66-8f77-49b0-9e35-16f729116120</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <title>Notes on Upgrading Windows XP MCE 2005/IIS5 to Vista/IIS7</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,68d9cc66-8f77-49b0-9e35-16f729116120.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,68d9cc66-8f77-49b0-9e35-16f729116120.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 20:20:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #003300; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"&gt;Although usually
I prefer to make a clean installation of a new OS to lose all the junk accumulated
since last OS upgrade, this time I decided to upgrade our family Media Center box
instead, because unlike my desktop the MCE box has just a few basic server apps, like
IIS, email server, ORB, &lt;a href="http://www.asciiexpress.com/webguide/download.aspx"&gt;WebGuide&lt;/a&gt;&lt;?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /&gt;,
and of course MCE 2005.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #003300; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"&gt;Overall, upgrade
was a success, but most of the drivers and applications had to be either upgraded
or reinstalled. There were quite a few things to take care of:&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul type=disc&gt;
&lt;li class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; COLOR: #003300; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in"&gt;
&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"&gt;Running &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/windowsvista/buyorupgrade/upgradeadvisor.mspx"&gt;&lt;font color=#800080&gt;Vista
Upgrade Advisor&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /&gt; was
a good idea. It tells upfront which drivers, services and application will not, or
may not work. The most important thing it told me was that I don't have enough space
on drive C:, so since it was still an XP I used Norton Partition Magic to increased
the C: partition size by 25 GB. I also downloaded some 
&lt;st1:place w:st="on"&gt;Vista&lt;/st1:place&gt;
drivers before starting the upgrade just in case my network card would not work after
the upgrade.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/span&gt; 
&lt;li class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; COLOR: #003300; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in"&gt;
&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"&gt;Although ATI Catalyst software
was not among those Vista Upgrade Advisor suggested to remove, the screen resolution
settings were not preserved&amp;nbsp;by the upgrade process. Moreover, standard MS ATI
driver didn't support resolutions required by some HDTV sets. I had to visit ATI web
site and download the latest driver and the Catalyst software. Once I've done that&amp;nbsp;I
was able to&amp;nbsp;adjust the resolution back to what it used to be.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"&gt; 
&lt;li class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; COLOR: #003300; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in"&gt;
&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"&gt;MCE settings partially survived.
Scheduled series settings carried over fine, but Signal settings and Guide had to
be specified again&amp;nbsp;by going through the setup wizard. I had my recorded TV shows
location in XP MCE changed from the default. While new MCE in Vista has found them,
I still had to specified the location for new recordings. Thankfully, it was easy
- the UI allowing to change the location of newly recorded shows is built into Vista's
MCE app. Pictures and Music location settings have carried over with no problem.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/span&gt; 
&lt;li class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; COLOR: #003300; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in"&gt;
&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"&gt;The hardest part was to revive
ASP.NET applications and sites after IIS was upgraded from IIS5 on XP to IIS 7.0 on
Vista. The hardest problem was that caused by the remnants of some old version of
.NET&amp;nbsp;Framework 2.0. That caused application pools hosting .NET 2.0 to crash hard
on the very first request while spitting out strange errors, like "&lt;em&gt;The worker
process failed to pre-load .Net Runtime version v2.0.&lt;/em&gt;"&amp;nbsp;to the application
log. It took me two days of Internet searching to find &lt;a href="http://forums.iis.net/p/1053655/1580578.aspx#1580578"&gt;the
solution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
ASP.NET 1.1 applications were also all not working. I had to run aspnet_regiis.exe
from the 1.1 Framework to bring them back to life.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In many cases I had to manually ACL folders containing ASP.NET applications with access
rights for "NETWORK SERVICE" user account. I also had to change anonymous authentication
account from IUSR_whatever to appPool identity.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The bottom line is migration of ASP.NET web apps was not trivial.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/span&gt; 
&lt;li class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; COLOR: #003300; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in"&gt;
Both Orb and WebGuide stopped working after the upgrade. I upgraded ORB with no problem
and uninstalled the WebGuide so I could install Vista-specific version of the WG.
It all went fine - that's after I was done fixing all the IIS7 glitches.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/span&gt; 
&lt;li class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; COLOR: #003300; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in"&gt;
&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"&gt;dasBlog 1.9 - the software running
this blog - ended up being incompatible with Vista. I had to move this blog to another
server running good ole' Windows 2003/IIS 6.0. After moving the app to another server,
which was free of surprises, the final challenge was to redirect links going to old
blog location pointing to IIS7/Vista to the new one. Unlike IIS6, IIS7 does not have
a UI where you could choose "A redirection to a URL" as a destination for your virtual
directory. Redirection in IIS7 can be done but it requires &lt;a href="http://forums.iis.net/p/1100154/1675077.aspx#1675077"&gt;running
a command-line utility&lt;/a&gt;. Fortunately that worked.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/span&gt; 
&lt;li class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; COLOR: #003300; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in"&gt;
&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"&gt;Unlike IIS, &lt;a href="http://ultidev.com/Products/Cassini/"&gt;UltiDev
Cassini Web Server&lt;/a&gt; underpinning WebGuide4 went through upgrade precess as smooth
as it can be.&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;
&lt;o:p&gt;
&lt;font face="Times New Roman" color=#000000 size=3&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/o:p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/aggbug.ashx?id=68d9cc66-8f77-49b0-9e35-16f729116120" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/CommentView,guid,68d9cc66-8f77-49b0-9e35-16f729116120.aspx</comments>
      <category>ASP.NET;Digital Home;IIS7;Vista</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=2884fdba-57bb-4c69-b5ff-06b1e4e9c2d8</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,2884fdba-57bb-4c69-b5ff-06b1e4e9c2d8.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Vlad Hrybok</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/CommentView,guid,2884fdba-57bb-4c69-b5ff-06b1e4e9c2d8.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=2884fdba-57bb-4c69-b5ff-06b1e4e9c2d8</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Recently I've been working on the small ASP.NET 2.0 app that has a page containing
Macromedia (now Adobe) Flash object. When I tried debugging it with Visual Studio
2005 and its internal web server, the Flash piece has never been loaded by Internet
Explorer - I am not even sure whether it was the Flash player that failed to load
or the .SWF file. I wonder if anyone else had this issue. I could not check which
component was not loaded because WebDev.WebServer2.exe serves only local applications,
and I could not use an http tracer to see which request gets stuck.
</p>
        <p>
I worked around the issue by switching to our own <a href="http://ultidev.com/products/Cassini/index.htm">UltiDev
Cassini for ASP.NET 2.0</a> for <a href="http://ultidev.com/products/Cassini/CassiniDevGuide.htm#Debugging">application
debugging</a>. It served all the bits and pieces required by Flash without
a hitch.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/aggbug.ashx?id=2884fdba-57bb-4c69-b5ff-06b1e4e9c2d8" />
      </body>
      <title>Problem with Macromedia (Adobe) Flash Object on the ASP.NET Page Served by Visual Studio 2005 WebDev.WebServer2.exe</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,2884fdba-57bb-4c69-b5ff-06b1e4e9c2d8.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,2884fdba-57bb-4c69-b5ff-06b1e4e9c2d8.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 21:22:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Recently I've been working on the small ASP.NET 2.0 app that has a page containing
Macromedia (now Adobe) Flash object. When I tried debugging it with Visual Studio
2005 and its internal web server, the Flash piece&amp;nbsp;has never been loaded by Internet
Explorer - I am not even sure whether it was the Flash player that failed to load
or the .SWF file. I wonder if anyone else had this issue. I could&amp;nbsp;not check which
component was not loaded because WebDev.WebServer2.exe serves only local applications,
and I could not use&amp;nbsp;an http tracer&amp;nbsp;to see which request gets stuck.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I worked around&amp;nbsp;the issue by&amp;nbsp;switching to&amp;nbsp;our own &lt;a href="http://ultidev.com/products/Cassini/index.htm"&gt;UltiDev
Cassini for ASP.NET 2.0&lt;/a&gt; for &lt;a href="http://ultidev.com/products/Cassini/CassiniDevGuide.htm#Debugging"&gt;application
debugging&lt;/a&gt;. It served all the bits and pieces&amp;nbsp;required by&amp;nbsp;Flash without
a hitch.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/aggbug.ashx?id=2884fdba-57bb-4c69-b5ff-06b1e4e9c2d8" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/CommentView,guid,2884fdba-57bb-4c69-b5ff-06b1e4e9c2d8.aspx</comments>
      <category>ASP.NET;Cassini Web Server;IIS7;Sofware Development;Visual Studio</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=2f68350c-fa77-4d77-9490-5cb9efc22615</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,2f68350c-fa77-4d77-9490-5cb9efc22615.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Vlad Hrybok</dc:creator>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=2f68350c-fa77-4d77-9490-5cb9efc22615</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
In the brave new world, where nearly all CPUs are <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.asp?Submit=Property&amp;Subcategory=343&amp;Description=&amp;Type=&amp;srchInDesc=&amp;MinPrice=&amp;MaxPrice=&amp;PropertyCodeValue=2663%3A16752">64
bit</a>, and Vista x64 is poised to have a large market share, how many ASP.NET 1.1
developers will find themselves in the situation where IIS7 running on x64 OS can't
create an application pool for .NET Framework 1.1, therefore making it impossible
to debug ASP.NET 1.1 applications under IIS7 using Visual Studio.NET 2003? All because when
looking for available ASP.NET versions, IIS7 is probably looking into 64 bit .NET
Framework folder - "C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework64", which only has 2.0
and 3.0 versions in it. Not knowing this would be the case, I recently installed
Vista x64 on my newly upgraded Dev box and almost fainted when I realized I can't
use VS.NET 2003 to debug legacy ASP.NET 1.1 apps. It took me a while to realize that
our <a href="http://www.ultidev.com/download/">own Cassini Web Server for ASP.NET
1.1</a> may work just fine, because it has its own routines for discovering location
of .NET Framework 1.1 files, and it can be used for debugging of ASP.NET 1.1
application in VS.NET 2003. I tried it a few days ago, and sure enough our little
Cassini saved the day - Visual Studio.NET 2003 ran an ASP.NET 1.1 app on our <a href="http://www.ultidev.com/products/Cassini/CassiniDevGuide.htm#Debugging">Cassini
in Debug mode</a> without a hitch!
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/aggbug.ashx?id=2f68350c-fa77-4d77-9490-5cb9efc22615" />
      </body>
      <title>Visual Studio.NET 2003, ASP.NET 1.1 and IIS7 on Vista x64</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,2f68350c-fa77-4d77-9490-5cb9efc22615.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,2f68350c-fa77-4d77-9490-5cb9efc22615.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:35:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
In the brave new world, where nearly all CPUs are &lt;a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.asp?Submit=Property&amp;amp;Subcategory=343&amp;amp;Description=&amp;amp;Type=&amp;amp;srchInDesc=&amp;amp;MinPrice=&amp;amp;MaxPrice=&amp;amp;PropertyCodeValue=2663%3A16752"&gt;64
bit&lt;/a&gt;, and Vista x64 is poised to have a large market share, how many ASP.NET 1.1
developers will find themselves in the situation where IIS7 running on&amp;nbsp;x64 OS&amp;nbsp;can't
create an application pool for .NET Framework 1.1, therefore making it impossible
to debug ASP.NET 1.1 applications under IIS7 using Visual Studio.NET 2003? All because&amp;nbsp;when
looking for available ASP.NET versions, IIS7 is probably looking into 64 bit&amp;nbsp;.NET
Framework&amp;nbsp;folder - "C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework64", which only has&amp;nbsp;2.0
and 3.0&amp;nbsp;versions in it. Not knowing this would be the case, I recently installed
Vista x64 on my newly upgraded Dev box and almost fainted when I realized I can't
use VS.NET 2003 to debug legacy ASP.NET 1.1 apps. It took me a while to realize that
our &lt;a href="http://www.ultidev.com/download/"&gt;own Cassini Web Server for ASP.NET
1.1&lt;/a&gt; may work just fine, because it has its own routines for discovering location
of .NET Framework 1.1 files, and it can be used for debugging of&amp;nbsp;ASP.NET 1.1
application in VS.NET 2003. I tried it a few days ago, and sure enough&amp;nbsp;our little
Cassini saved the day - Visual Studio.NET 2003 ran an ASP.NET 1.1 app on our &lt;a href="http://www.ultidev.com/products/Cassini/CassiniDevGuide.htm#Debugging"&gt;Cassini
in Debug mode&lt;/a&gt; without a hitch!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/aggbug.ashx?id=2f68350c-fa77-4d77-9490-5cb9efc22615" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/CommentView,guid,2f68350c-fa77-4d77-9490-5cb9efc22615.aspx</comments>
      <category>ASP.NET 1.1;Cassini Web Server;IIS7;Vista;Visual Studio.NET 2003;x64;.NET Framework 1.1</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=40fbefde-2b91-4b47-bc6a-d4f48e53af61</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,40fbefde-2b91-4b47-bc6a-d4f48e53af61.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Vlad Hrybok</dc:creator>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=40fbefde-2b91-4b47-bc6a-d4f48e53af61</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Microsoft <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/virtualserver/downloads/servicepack.mspx">Virtual
Server R2 SP Beta</a> works really well on Vista x64 and Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 CPU,
which has Virtualization support. Installer was not completely hands-off - I had to
add CGI module to IIS7 manually - otherwise VSWebApp.exe was treated as downloadable
file and not as CGI module. MS needs to update VS installer to automate this step.
</p>
        <p>
Please note that although MS Virtual Server R2 Beta can run on Vista x64, it can't
host 64-bit OSes. To host 64 bit OSes you would need free <a href="PermaLink,guid,d5c6c382-842b-44ea-9e2a-9f6192b37134.aspx">VmWare
Server</a> installed on x64 Windows 2003 Server, and either AMD 64 bit CPU or Intel
EMT64 CPU with Virtualization Technology (VT) support (like Core 2 Duo E6300
or E6400 CPUs).
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/aggbug.ashx?id=40fbefde-2b91-4b47-bc6a-d4f48e53af61" />
      </body>
      <title>Microsoft Virtual Server R2 SP1 on Vista x64 and Intel Core 2 Duo CPU</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,40fbefde-2b91-4b47-bc6a-d4f48e53af61.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/PermaLink,guid,40fbefde-2b91-4b47-bc6a-d4f48e53af61.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:29:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Microsoft &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/virtualserver/downloads/servicepack.mspx"&gt;Virtual
Server R2 SP Beta&lt;/a&gt; works really well on Vista x64 and Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 CPU,
which has Virtualization support. Installer was not completely hands-off - I had to
add CGI module to IIS7 manually - otherwise VSWebApp.exe was treated as downloadable
file and not as CGI module. MS needs to update VS installer to automate this step.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Please note that although MS Virtual Server R2 Beta can run on Vista x64, it can't
host 64-bit OSes. To host 64 bit OSes you would need free &lt;a href="PermaLink,guid,d5c6c382-842b-44ea-9e2a-9f6192b37134.aspx"&gt;VmWare
Server&lt;/a&gt; installed on x64 Windows 2003 Server, and either AMD 64 bit CPU or Intel
EMT64 CPU with Virtualization Technology (VT)&amp;nbsp;support (like Core 2 Duo E6300
or E6400 CPUs).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/aggbug.ashx?id=40fbefde-2b91-4b47-bc6a-d4f48e53af61" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://vladsnotes.hrybok.com/CommentView,guid,40fbefde-2b91-4b47-bc6a-d4f48e53af61.aspx</comments>
      <category>IIS7;Software Testing;Virtual Server;Vista;VmWare;x64</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>