Navigation

Search

Categories

On this page

Archive

Blogroll

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

RSS 2.0 | Atom 1.0 | CDF

Send mail to the author(s) E-mail

Total Posts: 81
This Year: 1
This Month: 0
This Week: 0
Comments: 33

Sign In
Pick a theme:

 Monday, December 01, 2008
Monday, December 01, 2008 10:31:40 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00) (  |  |  |  )

While comparing two Intel quad-core CPUs, Q6600 and Q8200, it was hard to arrive at the decision because for some inexplicable reason Intel does not state the TDP of Q6600. I reviewed several sources, and values are all over the map, from clearly incorrect 65W, to what looks like actual value of 105 Watt.

Since both CPUs cost $190 at this point, the decision which one to get comes down to whether you'd rather have a VT (virtualization technology), twice (8MB) the L2 cache and a little higher 2.4GHz clock of Q6600, vs. faster 1333 MHz FSB and 10W less of power consumption of Q8200.

All comments require the approval of the site owner before being displayed.
Name
E-mail
(will show your gravatar icon)
Home page

Comment (HTML not allowed)  

Enter the code shown (prevents robots):